<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR Update:  Google penalizes sites for text link ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94</link>
	<description>Wordpress Themes, Plugins, CSS, Blogging, and SEO Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fili</title>
		<link>http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94/comment-page-1#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Fili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94#comment-181</guid>
		<description>:S

I think in general this move might make sense, as those paid links do abuse the algorithm, so for Google to offer paid links beats the whole point of trying to make a search engine algorithm that would yield the best result. BUT, the way Google is doing this is outrageous. Some people make a lot of money from paid links, and that would be a problem for a while, but I trust the people will find the way to go beyond that. It&#039;s a bit like the hacker/virus vs. anti-virus/security companies. The later can win a battle or two, but never the whole war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:S</p>
<p>I think in general this move might make sense, as those paid links do abuse the algorithm, so for Google to offer paid links beats the whole point of trying to make a search engine algorithm that would yield the best result. BUT, the way Google is doing this is outrageous. Some people make a lot of money from paid links, and that would be a problem for a while, but I trust the people will find the way to go beyond that. It&#8217;s a bit like the hacker/virus vs. anti-virus/security companies. The later can win a battle or two, but never the whole war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clearcutblogging</title>
		<link>http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94/comment-page-1#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>clearcutblogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94#comment-180</guid>
		<description>We can all assume now why it took so long for Google to release the latest PR update.  They were working night and day to catch the profiteers.  Thing is, most people just want the money.  Why doesn&#039;t Google make a Text Link Ad program that pays more then the others?  People don&#039;t care where the money comes from...  And that way Google can rationalize PR transfer through paid link$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can all assume now why it took so long for Google to release the latest PR update.  They were working night and day to catch the profiteers.  Thing is, most people just want the money.  Why doesn&#8217;t Google make a Text Link Ad program that pays more then the others?  People don&#8217;t care where the money comes from&#8230;  And that way Google can rationalize PR transfer through paid link$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fili</title>
		<link>http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Fili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearcutblogging.com/google-page-rank/pr-update-google-penalizes-sites-for-text-link-ads/94#comment-179</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got some nice articles running lately, and this is a good post.

I am personally overwhelmed by how Google is enforcing a change in how things are done in the web. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen something quite like this before, either that Microsoft doing the same in the OS area. I believe in general Karma and honestly can&#039;t believe they&#039;ll be able to get away with something like this for long. Manual penalties? at least with Adsense they let you know what you&#039;ve done and give you time to change that (3 days), but in this case - it&#039;s all speculation based with rumors running around and general chaos. The whole way Google is doing this looks like bad news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got some nice articles running lately, and this is a good post.</p>
<p>I am personally overwhelmed by how Google is enforcing a change in how things are done in the web. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen something quite like this before, either that Microsoft doing the same in the OS area. I believe in general Karma and honestly can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;ll be able to get away with something like this for long. Manual penalties? at least with Adsense they let you know what you&#8217;ve done and give you time to change that (3 days), but in this case &#8211; it&#8217;s all speculation based with rumors running around and general chaos. The whole way Google is doing this looks like bad news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
